|
May 10, 2006 Report Part 2 of 6
(Continued from Part #1 that ended partway through Item #5 "Communications" with Item 5.3 "Correspondence from the Honourable Madeleine Meilleur, Minister of Community and Social Services respecting social assistance in Ontario" )
5. Communications - cont'd. .
(Pearson / Mitchell - CARRIED as Amended)
(Please note : Communications Items are listed in this transcription in the order Council dealt with them at the meeting.)
Mayor DiIanni : "Okay. 5.8, please, request for Nominations - the AMO [Association of Municipalities of Ontario] Board of Directors. And, the recommendation is up to us, please."
5.8 (Added) - Request for Nominations - AMO [Association of Municipalities of Ontario ] Board of Directors
Recommendation: For the consideration of Council
Consideration put for Recommendation : "That Councillor Bill Kelly's name be carried forward for nomination to the Board of Directors of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario"
(Whitehead / Merulla - CARRIED)
Mayor DiIanni : "Are there any Members interested? And, usually what we do is we select somebody who is interested. I think the Mayor is nominated to the large Urban Council. And then, if there is anybody from Council that's interested, we'll certainly carry their name forward."
"Any volunteers who are interested, folks?" (pause) "Well, we're a fairly large city. Councillor Braden, do you want to try to encourage some of your colleagues to take up the - " (hear someone say something off microphone) "Well, we'd like to have one - at least - to represent Hamilton ." (hear someone say something off microphone)
"Okay, Councillor Kelly's interested. Moved by Councillor Whitehead; Seconded by Councillor Merulla. All in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "That's carried. Thank you."
"Councillor Pearson, may I have a Motion on Communications, then - oh, Councillor McHattie, you have an item?"
5.10 (Added) - Correspondence from Joseph Mancinelli of LIUNA [Laborers' International Union of North America] (dated May 8, 2006 ) regarding the Lister Block
Recommendation: Be received
(Clerk's note: Councillor McHattie will have a Motion respecting this item)
Consideration put for Recommendation : "That
(a) added Communication item 5.10 from LIUNA respecting Lister Block be referred to a Special Committee of the Whole meeting; and
(b) that Joseph Mancinelli be invited to attend the special meeting to discuss the contents of the correspondence."
(McHattie / McCarthy)
Friendly Amendment to Motion Put : "That the meeting be properly advertised so that delegations may be heard from all who wish to speak on the issue"
(Kelly)
Staff Direction : "That the meeting be held at night."
(Samson)
Modification to Staff Direction : "That the meeting have a late afternoon start then can go into the evening."
(Mayor DiIanni )
(Motion CARRIED as Amended)
McHattie : "Sorry, I would like to address, Item 5.10. That's the - "
Mayor DiIanni : " - oh, right - "
McHattie : " - the LIUNA letter to City Council. Each Member of Council would have received this. It was dated May 8 th , 2006 by - and I think authored - by Joseph Mancinelli from LIUNA.
"I have a Motion on this. Moved by myself and Seconded by Councillor McCarthy that: 'Added Communication Item 5.10 ." (Councillor McHattie goes on to read the Motion as noted above)
"Mr. Mayor, if I can just speak to that for a moment, if I can, briefly."
Mayor DiIanni : "Go ahead."
McHattie : "In reading though the letter - I had an opportunity to do so today. I guess we received it on Monday and I read through it, today."
"There's some really discouraging comments by Mr. Mancinelli about the LACAC [ Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee ] Committee, which is our Municipal Heritage Committee. Councillor Pearson and I sit on that committee on behalf of City Council."
"And, he indicates that his project has suffered significant delays because of LACAC. And, he believes that certain individuals within LACAC have been working against this project in an attempt to stop it."
"He goes on by saying: 'At the risk of sounding controversial, I feel that certain individuals associated with LACAC are working on behalf of the interests of other developers.' "
"Mr. Mayor, this is pretty serious allegations made by Mr. Mancinelli. And, that really concerns me - certainly, Councillor McCarthy and myself - er, Pearson, rather, and myself - sit on the Committee on behalf of Council and a number of volunteers who spend lots of their own time working on the committee is a real concern to have those allegations come forth."
"I had an opportunity to look back at the staff report on the Lister Block in April of last year. And, the section that has to do with heritage is really straight forward. The landlord - LIUNA - would be required to comply with the Heritage Act requirements for a Heritage Permit. It talks about the Heritage Impact Assessment; the peer review by the City; and, the requirement to undertake work with a qualified heritage restoration professional - really straight forward guidance on behalf of City Council to LIUNA."
"So, it's tremendously unfortunate that they would weigh in at this point when the report is not finalized yet to - with these sorts of comments."
"There are other comments in this letter, as well, which I'll leave alone. But, Mr. Mayor, I think it's important that we move to a Committee of the Whole to address the issues that are in with the Lister Block inviting Mr. Mancinelli to share his comments directly. To be there for us to ask him questions - perhaps about some of those allegations. And, of course, about the project, itself. Thank you."
Mayor DiIanni : "Councillor Jackson."
Jackson : "Mr. Mayor, I've listened to my Council colleague, McHattie and his suggestion. And, I'm not here to debate with him the reasons for why he wants to do this. My only thing, procedurally, is that my understanding - and please help me, here, if the Clerks can help me. Or, Mr. Mayor, yourself. Or, the appropriate staff can help me - my understanding with this project is that the Municipal Heritage Committee will be reporting it's findings and making a recommendation through Planning and Economic Development Committee -which of course, then, will report through City Council."
"And, so - and if that is the case, then I'm just wondering wouldn't it be appropriate at that time for the proponent, Mr. Mancinelli, to come in - at the Planning and Economic Development Committee meeting where the entire discussion will have a fullness of debate with both the proponents -whatever Heritage Committee has to say. Whatever planning staff has to say. And, any who may be opposed to the proponents proposal."
"So, Mr. Mayor, first of all, could I just get verified either through Lee Ann Coveyduck and, or Clerks, exactly is the procedure the way I understand it to be - please, Mr. Mayor, through you."
Lee Ann Coveyduck - General Manager, Planning and Development : "Yes, through you, Mr. Mayor. There is a staff report and a recommendation going to the very next Municipal Heritage Advisory Committee meeting."
"The Municipal Heritage Advisory Committee will make their comments. And, staff will then bring forward a report to Planning and Economic Development Committee with the staff recommendation. And, also include any of the comments and suggestions made by the LACAC Committee."
Jackson : "And so, - thank you, Lee Ann - and so through you, Mr. Mayor, to Kevin Christenson, our Clerk. I mean I would presume that - at that open public forum at the Planning and Economic Development Committee where this will have fullness of debate, if Mr. Mancinelli, or any others wish to come in, or be invited to come in, I presume that they would come in at that time - would there be anything that would preclude them, Mr. Mayor. Through you, to Kevin - that would preclude them from coming in at that time. And, basically, then if Council colleagues have the challenging questions of what's in this letter, could be - could be questioned at that time. Through you, Mr. Mayor, to Kevin."
Kevin Christenson - City Clerk : "Through you, Mr. Mayor. If it's been pre-established that that's the agenda, that would be appropriate. If there's others that you want to add, you would just waive the rules to introduce further individuals or parties and could answer any questions that the Committee may have."
Jackson : "Thanks Mr. Christenson. Well, Mr. Mayor, I just feel that I'm trying to understand the necessity of this special Committee of the Whole meeting to basically deal with this letter when, after we have this letter and Mr. Mancinelli in, I'm sure that eventually questions and comments are going to lead to the project itself, whereas the Municipal Heritage Committee status of their recommendation where staff - and it could just pre-empt what will be a full discussion at the Standing Committee."
"So, for those reasons, Mr. Mayor, unless I hear something more that is germane and very, very important to having this Special COW [Committee of the Whole] I will regretfully be recorded as opposed to the referral to a Special COW. Thanks, Mr. Mayor."
Mayor DiIanni : "Thank you. Councillor Pearson."
Pearson : "Well, Mr. Mayor, the process has been elaborated by Lee Ann Coveyduck. This particular item - Lister Block - is going to LACAC on May 18 th . It will have its full report come forward to the Committee. And, from there, the recommendations of that Committee will come to the Planning Committee - the next Planning Committee. And, we should be dealing with this - or addressing it at the June 6 th , I think, Council meeting."
"So, the timelines are there. I have to concur with - in being a member on the LACAC Committee - I think it has to follow the proper process. And, I think at the date of it coming to Planning Committee, if there's direction that maybe we go to Committee of the Whole at that time. But, I think we need the direction and the position of LACAC before we do anything."
"So, I would not support having this go to Committee of the Whole at this time."
Mayor DiIanni : "Councillor Braden, then I'd like to say something and then, Councillor McHattie, as well."
Braden : "Well, thank you, Mr. Mayor. And, it's interesting that we all have different views. I was listening to the debate and this is a little bit new to me - although the issue certainly isn't. And, I think that we would all agree that issue is of interest to everybody on - that sits on Council."
"So, I would start by saying, I know already, that the Planning and Development meetings from now 'til summer are full. Anybody that's been on that committee will realize it's a little bit pointless but we're still there about 4:30 [pm] in the afternoon - sometimes not finishing. That's not really a great way to do business. But, we've been warned by Planning staff that maybe we have to have an extra day. So, basically the blotter is already full."
"But, second of all, because I think this issue is of interest, I hear the words saying: 'not pre-empting a full debate.' I think, in fact, on this particular issue, everybody wants to be part of the debate. We don't want to get this second-handed. I'm on Planning and Development Committee and maybe that wasn't such a hot idea." (hear giggles from Council and gallery) "But, if you weren't on that committee. Or, if you weren't available on that day. And the Committee of the Whole presumably would be scheduled in advance. Then there's probably going to be a lot of people who are probably - likely - going to miss that debate. And, if we don't have that debate again in Council, for those that weren't at the Planning and [Economic] Development - I mean, there's no point in having two debates. So, I think the appropriate thing is, let's get the debate among all of us because this - we will all admit - this is a serious issue for all of us, in terms of money; in terms of its image; and there's been some controversies that I think we would like to get out of the way."
"So, I think Committee of the Whole is the appropriate way to go. Thank you."
Mayor DiIanni : "Thank you. And, I will come to Councillor Braden. Councillor Whitehead - was there somebody else - " (hear someone say something off microphone) "Go ahead."
Merulla : "I believe there's a misunderstanding. Councillor McHattie's intent is to have this meeting subsequent to LACAC's decision - not prior to."
Mayor DiIanni : "Oh, is that what you meant, Councillor McHattie." (hear Councillor McHattie off someone else's microphone say: 'Ya, sorry.')
McHattie : "I'm not being clear at all. My apologies, Mr. Mayor. The idea is that - "
Mayor DiIanni : " - second time to speak, right?" (hear giggles from Council)
McHattie : "Well, it's uh, unfortunately carries on. Some people had noticed that. But - " (hear some giggles and someone saying something off microphone) "Thanks, that's not bad, is it. Ya."
"But the idea is that it certainly goes to LACAC. Ordinarily, it would go to Planning Committee - quite correct, no question about that. But, due to the importance of the issue, it's one of the more important issues that we'll decide on in the next six months that it would go to a Committee of the Whole instead of Planning and Economic Development Committee. And, delegations, I guess, could be heard. And, certainly, we'll all be around the table. And then, off to Council, of course, from there."
"So, we're simply replacing the PED [Planning and Economic Development] the Planning Committee meeting" (hear a glass clink) "with a Committee of the Whole meeting so that we can all be part of it. That's the intent."
Mayor DiIanni : "Okay. And that, frankly, makes some sense. Can I just point a couple of things out."
"One, which I think are important. And, I know the letter's on my desk somewhere. I haven't gotten to it. And, I hadn't read some of the portions until now. I believe very - very, very sincerely, that LACAC has followed the process. And, I'm looking to staff. LACAC has followed the process; has not tried to delay this in the least. They followed the appropriate process to take this forward. And, we'll make a decision based on all of the information that they have."
"So, I want to, I want to reinforce the fact that, in fact that our Heritage Committee has, and is, doing it's job in terms of the process. I also want to make it clear that this issue is of interest to all of Council. And so, I'm supportive that we deal with it at the appropriate time, as a Committee of the Whole so that all of us can weigh in."
"Whether individuals form LACAC or LACAC, at the end of the day, supports or not what they're seeing in the community - and, I've had Members of LACAC speak to me over the last week or so and I know where that person who spoke to me stands on this issue. That's immaterial to what the Committee will do; it's immaterial to what staff will recommend; it's immaterial to what this Council will eventually do, as well - although important in terms of - immaterial in terms of the final decision, although important input, this Council will have to make a decision at some point."
"So I - certainly, with that clarification - without pre-empting anything - and especially the LACAC report - I think it's appropriate to have a gathering of the Whole when we discuss this. Councillor Whitehead." (Councillor Whitehead doesn't speak) "Councillor Kelly."
Kelly : "A couple of points of clarification, Mr. Mayor. I concur with the comments you just made. But, just to be clear on this. So, what we're going to do is circumvent the process. So, after the LACAC report is finished, it will not follow the usual procedure of going to Planning and Ec[onomic] Dev[elopment], it'll go right to Committee of the Whole ?"
Mayor DiIanni : "No, what I understood is that that the Planning and Ec[onomic] Dev[elopment] Committee meeting for that month will be a Committee of the whole meeting. Is that what you're intention is?"
Kelly : "My concern, Mr. Mayor, is I don't want to add an extra step to this process. There's got to be a special meeting that'll deal with this particular issue. And then, we take it off the Planning and Ec Dev blotter. I just want to clarify that - that we're not going to hear the same issue twice."
Mayor DiIanni : "No. No, that's not the intent."
Kelly : " - and, I don't have a problem with that because a few Members of Council may remember it's about a year ago that we dealt with this at a Special Committee of the Whole. And, we want to get this cleared up as soon as possible."
"I guess the other suggestion I would make - if it's okay with the Mover of the Motion, with Councillor McHattie - is that this meeting be properly advertised, that all interested parties be allowed to make delegation requests, too. Because, I'm sure that more people than Mr. Mancinelli are going to be involved in this and they're going to want to speak to this issue, too. And, I think we should entertain those delegation requests from other interested parties, too - which is going to make a probably a rather long meeting - not unlike the one we had a year ago. But, I think, to make sure that we get a full and proper debate, on that, I think we need to hear from all interested parties, not just the one that was mentioned in Councillor McHattie's Motion."
"I don't know if he can accept that as a friendly amendment?" (hear someone say something off microphone) "Good. Thanks, Mr. Mayor."
Mayor DiIanni : "Okay. Thank you. We'll consider that a friendly amendment. And, Councillor Samson."
Samson : "I would suggest, your Worship, that the meeting should be in the evening. This is a matter in which the citizens of Hamilton have been talking about for years and years and years. And, to have this debate during the day is not right. I think this particular meeting should be held at night ." (tape stopped, sorry)
Mayor DiIanni : (started speaking before I could get the tape turned over, sorry) " . appropriate time. It's going to be a long meeting. The only issue is if we start at 7:00 pm it - we may be here a long, long time. So, you may want to look at a late afternoon start and then carry on. That would include people as well. So, we'll leave that as staff direction for people. Okay."
"So, on the amended Motion, then. All in - Moved by Councillor McHattie and your Seconder was - Councillor McCarthy. All in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "That's carried."
5.1 Correspondence from John Bazinet, Chairman, Ottawa Street BIA addressing concerns respecting responsibilities for alleys including policies, by-laws
Recommendation: Be received and referred to the General Manager of Public Works for a report to the Public Works, Infrastructure and Environment Committee
(CARRIED)
5.2 Correspondence from Attorney General, Michael Bryant respecting Bill 14, the Access to Justice Act, 2005 and the city's concerns respecting potential impact on First Canadian Title
Recommendation: Be received
(CARRIED)
5.4 Correspondence from David Williams, MD, Associate Chief Medical Officer of Health and Director of Infectious Diseases Branch, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care respecting potential impacts of the Haines Report on Hamilton's Public Health Services food safety program
Recommendation: Be received
(CARRIED)
5.7 (Added) - Petition signed by 11 residents objecting to relocation of bus stop from north east corner of Delaware and St. Clair to 185 Delaware Avenue
Recommendation: Be received and referred to the General Manager of Public Works for a report to the Public Works, Infrastructure and Environment Committee
(CARRIED)
5.9 (Added) - Correspondence from Rick Smith, Environmental Defence respecting Protection of the Greenbelt within the City of Hamilton (Item 12 of PED [Planning and Economic Development] Report 06-007, May 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Be received
(CARRIED)
Mayor DiIanni : "Now Councillor Pearson, please."
Pearson : "Thank you, Mr. Mayor. The Motion - it's been Moved by myself; Seconded by Councillor Mitchell that Council Communications Items 5.1 to 5.10 be approved as follows and amended. And, do you want me - wish me to go through them. Or, just accept them."
Mayor DiIanni : "No, I think we're okay."
Pearson : "Thank you."
Mayor DiIanni : "All in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "That's carried."
6. Committee Reports
MOTION - To go into Committee of the Whole for Consideration of Committee Reports
(Pearson / Mitchell - CARRIED)
Mayor DiIanni : "Councillor Pearson, now, a Motion on - "
Pearson : " - going into Committee of the Whole - "
Mayor DiIanni : " - on Committees, yes. Thank you - "
Peason : "It's been Moved by myself, Mr. Mayor; Seconded by Councillor Mitchell that Council move into Committee of the Whole for consideration of the Committee reports."
6.1 Public Works, Infrastructure and Environment Committee Report 06-008, May 1, 2006 http://www.myhamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/24182526-68F0-41B8-AA1D-D54AB8E6ACAE/0/May01Report06008.pdf )
(McCarthy / Merulla - CARRIED)
Mayor DiIanni : "Thank you. And, the first - all in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "It's carried."
Mayor DiIanni : "And the first report is from PWIE [Public Works, Infrastructure and Environment Committee] presenting it's 8th report and recommending Item #1" (hear councillors say carried) "2 . 3" (hear councillors say carried; and, hear a glass clink) "on 3?" (hear someone say 4, off microphone) "Go ahead."
COMMENT ON - Item #4
" 4. Chedoke Farms Fessenden Subdivision Petition - Sewer Backups (PW06053) (Ward 8) (Item 8.1)
That Information report PW06053 respecting the Chedoke Farms Fessenden Subdivision Petition - Sewer Back-ups be received."
(CARRIED)
Whitehead : "Thank you, Mr. Mayor. This is the Chedoke Farms Fessenden Subdivision Petition regarding sewer backups; floods. And, I just want to congratulate staff."
"We brought in the independent community panel. And, I've never been so impressed with the quality and how knowledgeable the individuals representing this independent panel are. And, I want to thank staff. I mean, I talked to - I was at an open house last night at Chedoke Arena where it was the Mountainview Storm-Management consultations taking place. And, I talked to a number of the residents there. And, the response I got was one of confidence and one that - they met with the search committee; they were really impressed with the interaction with staff. And, I believe we're going down the right road."
"So, I want to thank the staff for pulling this together. And, reinstating confidence in the community. I think that you need to be congratulated for that. Thank you."
Mayor DiIanni : "Very good. All in favour of 4?" (hear councillors say carried) "5?" (hear councillors say carried; and hear a glass clink) "On 5, Councillor Braden"
COMMENTS ON - Item #5
" 5. City Hall Accommodation Adjacency Plan (Ward 2 with City Wide Implications) - (PW06054) (Item 7.1)
(a) That the proposed City Hall Departments/Divisions (summarized in Appendix "A" attached hereto) which outlines the Departments to be accommodated in City Hall after renovation, be received.
(b) That staff proceed with the City Hall renovation design in accordance with recommendation (a) of Report PW06054, and as set out in Staff Report PD05088/PW03010c/FCS03064c."
(CARRIED)
Braden : (starts speaking, going a few sentences before has microphone turned on - couldn't hear a word he was saying. Sorry.)
Mayor DiIanni : "I'm sorry, I - "
Braden : (Again starts speaking without microphone on) " . suggest that one of the design criteria be - when they renovate this building - is to consider what we are told by the Peak Oil Study - just to get it in the hamper - "
Mayor DiIanni : " - I think we've already passed that when we received that, to forward it to departments for consideration. So - "
Braden : " - okay - "
Mayor DiIanni : " - it's done - "
Braden : (says something. But, couldn't understand what he said.)
Mayor DiIanni : " - all right. We're on 5. All in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "6" (hear councillors say carried) "7" (hear councillors say carried) "Councillor McCarthy, please."
McCarthy : "Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's been Moved by myself and Seconded by Councillor Sam Merulla that he 8 th report of the Public Works, Infrastructure and Environment Committee be adopted and the Information Section received."
Mayor DiIanni : "Thank you. All in favour?" (hear councillors say carried) "It's carried."
6.2 Planning and Economic Development Committee Report 06-007, May 2, 2006
(to be distributed)
(Pearson / Mitchell - CARRIED as Amended)
Mayor DiIanni : "Members of Council the Planning and Ec[onomic] Dev[elopment] Committee presents its 7 th report and recommends Item 1" (hear councillors say carried) "2 .10" (hear councillors say carried)
"Councillor Bruckler, I understand you have a Motion to Table Item 11, pending public consultation.
MOTION TO TABLE - (pending public consultation) - Item #11
" 11. Applications for Amendments to the Stoney Creek Official Plan and Stoney Creek Zoning By-law No. 3692-92, and Draft Plan of Subdivision, "Heritage Greene," for Lands Located Within Special Policy Area "C", in the Former City of Stoney Creek (PED06137) (Ward 9) (Item 6.6)
(a) That approval be given to Subdivision Application 25T-200509, by 1322285 Ontario Ltd. (Silvestri Investments), owners , to establish a draft plan of subdivision, known as "Heritage Greene," on lands located on Part of Lot 32, Concession 7 (Saltfleet), as shown on Appendix "B" to Report PED06137, subject to the execution of a City standard form Subdivision Agreement, including the conditions contained in Appendix "C" to Report PED06137, and the following:
(i) Acknowledgement that there will be no City share for any municipal works related to this development; and,
(ii) That payment of Cash-in-Lieu of parkland be required, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance of each building permit for the blocks within the plan of subdivision. The payment will be based on a maximum of 5% of the value of the lands on the day prior to the day of the issuance of the building permit for the residential block(s), and 2% for the commercial block(s);
all in accordance with the Financial Policies for Development, and the City's Parkland Dedication By-law, as approved by Council.
(b) That approval be given to the amended application by 1322285 Ontario Ltd. (Silvestri Investments), owners , for Official Plan Amendment No. __, for land located within Part of Lot 32, Concession 7 (Saltfleet), as shown on Appendix "A" to Report PED06137, for a change in designation on Schedule "A" General Land Use Plan, from "Special Policy Area 'C'" to "Shopping Centres" and "Residential", and on Schedule "A3" Secondary Plan, West Mountain Planning District - Heritage Green Section, from "Special Policy Area 'C'" to "District Shopping Centre", "Community Shopping Centre" and "Medium-High Density Residential", of the City of Stoney Creek Official Plan.
(c) That approval be given to City Initiative CI-05-N and amended Zoning Application ZAC-03-93, by 1322285 Ontario Ltd. (Silvestri Investments), owners , for changes in zoning from the Neighbourhood Development "ND" Zone to the Community Shopping Centre (Holding) "SC2-3(H)" Zone, Neighbourhood Shopping Centre (Holding) "SC1-3(H)" Zone, Mixed Use Commercial (Holding) "MUC-1(H)" Zone, Multiple Residential (Holding) "RM3-27(H)", Multiple Residential (Holding) "RM4-5(H)" Zone, and Open Space "OS" Zone, to permit a mixed use development on lands known as Part of Lot 32, Concession 7 (Saltfleet), in the former City of Stoney Creek, shown as Blocks 1 to 6, respectively, on Schedule "A" of Appendix "D" to Report PED06137, on the following basis:
(i) That the attached draft By-law, included as Appendix "D" to Report PED06137, as amended by Committee on May 2, 2006, respecting a reduction in lot coverage, reduction in floor area for any individual store, reduction in parking space requirements, and clarifications regarding permitted restaurants, which has been prepared in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, not be enacted by City Council until a public information meeting has been held, in the local community, with an invitation to participate being sent to the Stoney Creek BIA, to explain the final recommendations regarding the subject development proposal.
(ii) That the amending By-law be added to Schedule "A", Map No. 16 of Zoning By-law No. 3692-92.
(iii) That the proposed changes in zoning conform to the Hamilton-Wentworth Official Plan, and will conform to the City of Stoney Creek Official Plan upon approval of Official Plan Amendment No.__.
(d) That upon finalization of Official Plan Amendment No. ___ and the implementing Zoning By-law, that the approved Valley Park Neighbourhood Plan be amended to reflect the designations and road pattern.
(e) And that the Site Plan for the eastern section of the proposed development be reviewed by the Community Advisory Group. "
MOTION to TABLE Item #11 - pending public consultation
(Bruckler / Jackson - CARRIED)
Bruckler : (speaks off microphone)
Mayor DiIanni : "Seconded by Councillor Jackson - Moved by Councillor Bruckler that 11 be tabled pending to some public consultation with his constituents. All in favour of that?" (hear councillors say carried) "That's carried."
See Part #3
Starting with Report Item #12 ( "12. Angelo Bonitatibus, respecting grading and flooding at San Diego Court, Ward 8 (Delegation approved by Committee, April 18, 2006) (Item 6.7)" ) of Committee Report Item 6.2 - "Planning and Economic Development Committee," Report 06-007, May 2, 2006
|