More than a third of Hamilton’s workforce is now commuting outside the city, slowly continuing a long-standing trend and adding to highway congestion. The recently released results of the massive Transportation Tomorrow Survey show local residents have more cars, and are driving them further and more often, although there is also a slight uptick in transit use.
The TTS collected 2011 travel data from nearly 160,000 households – just over 5% of those in the twenty participating municipalities that include all of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), Hamilton, Niagara Region, Waterloo Region, Guelph, Brantford, Barrie, Peterborough and the counties where they are located.
The Hamilton section of the report provides data for each of the six former municipalities that show nearly 60,000 employees travelling outside the city to work. That’s 34.4 percent of the workforce, up from 32.4 percent (53,500) in 2006. The contribution of Hamiltonians to regional traffic congestion has been climbing since the first TTS report twenty five years ago recorded 15.6 percent out-commuters (23,000).
The vast majority (82.5%) head into the GTA with over half of those travelling to Halton region. That’s similar to the 2006 results although there’s been a slight shift of about 700 commuters each to Niagara and Waterloo regions.
With the Toronto area now boasting some of the worst congestion on the continent, the provincial government has committed to a massive expansion of trains and buses including a rapid transit corridor in Hamilton. City councillors want full provincial funding for the latter – whether it’s light rail or a bus rapid transit system – but almost unanimously have rejected provincial suggestions for additional funding sources such as road tolls, parking fees, and/or gas tax hikes.
The city-wide numbers report Hamiltonians making an average of nearly three-quarters of a million vehicle trips per day, up about 35,000 on 2006. They also show 84 percent of all trips are by drivers or passengers in a vehicle, with walking and cycling accounting for 5 percent.
About 7 percent of Hamilton trips use local transit and another 1 percent travel on the GO system. That’s up slightly from 2006 when the GO numbers were too small to turn up in the rounded final figures, but is still less than the ten percent recorded in the 1986 TTS survey. The remaining 3 percent travel by taxi, school bus or motorcycle.
The TTS survey shows one in every seven Hamilton households did not have access to a vehicle in 2011, while nearly as many (11 percent) had three or more cars and trucks. For the first time in the five-year surveys, a clear majority of homes (56 percent) had two or more vehicles.
Not surprisingly, the breakdown by former municipality shows dramatic differences, with vehicle ownership far higher in the suburbs, especially in Flamborough, Ancaster and Glanbrook where at least 97 percent of households have at least one vehicle.
Flamborough is the lowest with one percent car-less, while Glanbrook has two percent and Ancaster three percent. In Stoney Creek one in twenty households don’t have a car, in Dundas it’s just about one in ten and in the old city of Hamilton a full one in five are car-less.
The TTS data doesn’t examine road space per household in the various former municipalities but lower density development especially in the newer suburban areas could mean multi-car households are being subsidized by those with just one vehicle or none. In the old city of Hamilton, for example, two-thirds of households have less than two vehicles, while that situation applies to less than one-third of homes in each of Ancaster, Glanbrook and Flamborough.
There are similar substantial differences in average length of trips, ranging from over nine kilometres in Glanbrook and Flamborough, to barely four in old Hamilton. The average for the whole city was 5.1 km with Dundas second lowest at 4.9 km.
Road and bridge construction and maintenance will consume over $100 million in this year’s city budget – more than a third of the total capital expenditures. Those numbers don’t include other road-related spending such as reconstruction connected with water and sewer projects paid for by water rates, policing costs, $6 million for street sweepers, etc.